Summary of Merja Makinen's article: Learning a new song - The Bloody Chamber and the Gothic
Colour is used to classify characters or moments, with white representing innocence(victim), black representing villainy (evil character), and red representing blood, death and horror. Horror versus terror is commonly used to divide gothic texts, with horror representing external fear/death and terror representing internal fear and the character’s worries. Gothic explores irrational concepts such as the supernatural.
The Bloody Chamber and external horror.
Gothic colours are explored in the bloody chamber through the young narrator’s white skin ( symbolising innocence), the red jewels, the fire opal and the necklace of rubies. Additionally, darkness/black is represented through the night/twilight which overlooks the majority of the story, as well as the ‘illimitable darkness’ in the chamber. The unnaturally white and waxy marquis, like the funeral lilies, convey the mask he wears for society to cover up his evilness, which is expressed through his eyes which have an ‘absolute absence of light’, this suggests the darkness of his soul.
Entrapment/imprisonment is conveyed through the medieval setting of the castle, and when the girl accepts she has ‘Lost, as the victim loses to the executioner’ and she submits to his demands to put her head on the block.
The Erl-King- internalised fear.
This story utilises terror and internal fear, because of this, following the story can be confusing and inconsistent, but this represents the inner conflicts the narrator faces. We see this especially when the narrative randomly switches between third, second and first person, and between past and present tense. Additionally, it is suggested that she has been lured to the Erl-King through his magic, so perhaps the confusing text also represents her disoriented, bewildered state. She describes the Erl-King in both attractive and ugly ways, again this reaffirms her confusion.
Re-writing the passive woman
Angela Carter challenges traditional depictions of female characters, she changes their passivity and virtue-focused narratives. Instead, Carter gives them strength and control. We can see this in ‘The Erl-King’ and ‘The Bloody Chamber’ when the women try to seduce their partners so they can kill them. They take action to protect themselves instead of submitting.
Lady of the House of Love
In this story, gender stereotypes and gothic character roles are reversed. The predator is female and the ingenuë is male.
'The Lady of the House of Love’ questions her predatory nature asking: ‘Can a bird sing only the song it knows or can it learn a new song?’. She examines her nature and her ancestors' expectations for her. (The Marquis is very different, he never questions his sadist nature. However, the control of cultural expectations is broken when the glass shatters and cuts the Lady. The two have to improvise and the predatory mouth-on-blood turns into a loving moment, the boy shows genuine care and nurtures her. Although a mundane ending, the story teaches us that no one is condemned by societal and cultural expectations.
Fairy-tale or Gothic?
Fairy tales and the Gothic have much in common, both stem from medieval oral traditions, both feature supernatural elements and have transformative resolutions. Carter references early oral versions of fairy tales in her work, that were sexually explicit and featured women who were more active and self-reliant. We can see this especially in ‘The Company of Wolves’ when phrases from the oral tale are referenced, but passivity and ingenuity are regretted.